I thought I would share this with everyone. Anyone that experiments with HHO can benefit from this.

It is a Excel spreadsheet that I have been using for a few years now. Plug in your amperage, voltage, temp, time and gas measurements and It will give you the MMW and efficiency % compensating for temperature of your water.

I am not the creator but I believe it to be accurate because the people that did create it are extremely bright.

MMW%20Calc%20with%20Temp%20Compensation%20V4.1.3BACKUP.xls

Views: 75

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Please let me know if that calculation is valid for PWM - on cathode. On anode seems to may need average voltage - according to ON/OF duty cycle - input. With the "switch" on cathode and with secondary cathode like my system I wonder how to interpret the data.

I get 4.61 (compensated) MMW and  I have 1.87 LPM at 14.5 A and 28 ( cathode pulsed)  V on 12 cells in series.

Still wait for an answer from anyone who may have it.

On PWM the MMW calculation should be corrected with duty cycle settings?

If MMW mean milliliters per minute per watt then on PWM should be compensated with ON/OFF duty cycle.

IF I'm right then on my set-up with cathode on PWM and a second cathode ( where voltage drop to 3 due distance ) then I must calculate and input the average voltage (  in my case with  50/50 duty cycle)  and I get 7.70 MMW - compensated by Gabet's calculator and  8.34 MMW compensated by your calculator.  

Is that correct? Since most people get 1 LPM at more than 15 A - 18 A average could be ..:)

The calculation this excel makes is on actual gas output so what your doing with a pwm makes no difference. You can make your cell jump up and down but the gas is still measured by output. As you can see 7.7mmw is very close to overunity and 8.24 is impossible. To get 8.24 you would need to pull energy out of thin air.

Steve



gabet123 said:

This one is also very good http://hodinfo.com/page/mmw-calc#axzz2A1zfe2vc

Bob Camball also made mine.

PWM cut the power on a duty cycle. Voltage is zero. average is based on duty cycle. current mean  total charges passed so  will  not change. 

Total power calculation should be  current x average voltage.

gas is relevant but mmw mean efficiency of a certain volume in milliliters per minute versus power in watts.

may get 0.02 LPM with 10 mmw ...super efficient and impractical to use for most application.

8 mmw is only 87% from unit base don same calculator.

some people get more....

I only get some current from capacitor on OFF phase....could be improved..

You keep thinking that. The point is you don't have overunity. You can twist the numbers all you want but you cant brake the law. You should pose your question to Bob Campball. He will have a better answer for you.

moldoveanu.marius said:

PWM cut the power on a duty cycle. Voltage is zero. average is based on duty cycle.

Total power calculation should be  current x average voltage.

gas is relevant but mmw mean efficiency of a certain volume in milliliters per minute versus power in watts.

may get 0.02 LPM with 10 mmw ...super efficient and impractical to use for most application.

8 mmw is only 87% from unit base don same calculator.

some people get more....

no I not have, no one will ever have ...:) 1 = infinite.

who's Mr.Campball and why I should ask him? 

I used both, the one from Gabet and yours

I add only duty cycle correction ...if is not correct I like to know ...not because 8 mmw is overunity ..or too close..:) 

I see now...Mr.Campball ( or Camball? as Gabet say) is the one who create both versions of that spreadsheet...OK, who can ask him or how can I contact him?

You are the one with that beautiful diagram...I suggested to add a second cathode - eventually a metallic tank...had you the curiosity to try? it will create a capacitor on OFF cycle and will get a better result in gas volumes and quality as well....

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Translate HODINFO

Fuel Savers Radio Podcast

Latest Activity

Profile IconHydrogen Cars and Vehicles Blog
yesterday
Profile IconHydrogen Cars and Vehicles Blog
Jun 13

HODINFO SPONSOR
Howard Phillips commented on tan kusuma's video
Jun 12
Profile IconHydrogen Cars and Vehicles Blog
Jun 12
Bo DuBose joined don's group
Jun 11
gabet123 updated their profile
Jun 11
Profile IconHydrogen Cars and Vehicles Blog
Jun 11
Dale Drew joined Heath's group
Jun 11

HODINFO SPONSOR
Jeremy Dukes posted a status
"tax benefits for those of us who have installed hho between '05-'10 on vehicles"
Jun 10
Rahul Kumar Rana updated their profile
Jun 9
moldoveanu.marius commented on Jaime 's photo
Jun 9
Jaime posted photos
Jun 8
Profile IconHydrogen Cars and Vehicles Blog
Jun 6
gabet123 replied to Matteo Monfardini's discussion 'New business in Italy'
Jun 6

HODINFO SPONSOR
Howard Phillips replied to gabet123's discussion 'Phillips Company CC-HOD Press release 3'
Jun 6
ocjox updated their profile
Jun 5
ocjox is now a member of HODINFO
Jun 5
Profile IconHydrogen Cars and Vehicles Blog
Jun 5

HODINFO SPONSOR
Howard Phillips posted a discussion
Jun 4

HODINFO SPONSOR
Howard Phillips commented on gabet123's group 'Chemistry Group'
Jun 4

© 2013   Created by gabet123.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service

Live Chat