Currently we are calculating your interaction numbers. For more info click
HERE

If you have a certified Zero Hex C Cell please post it here along with your proof that it is a Zero Hex C cell. If you are unaware of the HEX C issue, please read here http://hhoinfo.ning.com/forum/topics/2068750:Topic:15014 Since that thread was created many builders have worked towards eliminating the production of HEX C totally. This is the direction that the industry needs to go. Also I think the industy needs a labeling system for safety. Cells that are Certified Zero Hex C need to be labled Zero Hex-C and the ones that do produce Hex C need a warning lable of some sort. Does anyone know if the IHHOI is working on a labeling system?

Views: 19

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

How is a Zero Hex C cell possible? Are the plates/tubes treated with Tim Brauneck's coating, or something else? How is it Certified? I am very interested to know this.

You're right, this is the way the industry needs to go. I don't want to make another system unless it is ZHC.
If you are using any stainless steel in your cell, you ARE going to produce HEX-CHROME according to a local Cleveland, Ohio area plater by the name of Aetna Plating. They've been in the plating business for decades and have been dealing with the Hex-Chrome issue with the EPA due to its toxicity. They claim no matter what you do to your SS plates, such as passivation or electropolishing, if you're using SS in the electrolysis process, you will produce Hex-Chrome as the SS dissolves. No doubt that passivation and/or electropolishing will remove most of the surface iron, but will leave the chromium on the surface... if you've ever seen SS plates that have undergone either of these processes, they look almost like they've been chrome plated... hence, they will still produce Hex-Chrome, but there will be little, if any, mud produced. You can also visually see that you're making Hex-Chrome by the yellowing color that develops in your electrolyte if its clear enough... we've got a professional Hex-Chrome test kit to measure the concentration... as the yellow color intensifies, the higher the concentration. You'd be surprised how quickly you can make the Hex-Chrome.

Now, if you decide to use the much more pricey, solid TITANIUM, or other exotic metal, you WILL NOT produce any HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM. The one problem with titanium is that you must use an exotic coating on the ANODE side of all the cell plates in order to produce any HHO. The one great thing about using the HSA coated TI plates is that they last much longer than other metals, and have been used under extreme conditions in industrial applications for decades - such as in saltwater desalination plants and to produce caustic chlorine bleach for water treatment. We (MileageSeekersHHO) have been recently experimenting and designing an extremely low current-leakage titanium cell, pictures of which you can see on this site. We believe that TI will become the future standard for marketable HHO cells, since the EPA will no doubt get involved in "police-ing" the HHO industry as it grows.

Unca RaF
Been turning this over in my mind. If titanium can be used, could platinum also be used without producing Hex-C?

If so, then since the fossil fuel is being burned to the absoloute, what then is the need for a catalytic converter?

If you no longer need one, why not use the platinum put in the converters instead, to produce electrolysis cells?

This seems like a no-brainer to me.

Unca RaF said:
If you are using any stainless steel in your cell, you ARE going to produce HEX-CHROME according to a local Cleveland, Ohio area plater by the name of Aetna Plating. They've been in the plating business for decades and have been dealing with the Hex-Chrome issue with the EPA due to its toxicity. They claim no matter what you do to your SS plates, such as passivation or electropolishing, if you're using SS in the electrolysis process, you will produce Hex-Chrome as the SS dissolves. No doubt that passivation and/or electropolishing will remove most of the surface iron, but will leave the chromium on the surface... if you've ever seen SS plates that have undergone either of these processes, they look almost like they've been chrome plated... hence, they will still produce Hex-Chrome, but there will be little, if any, mud produced. You can also visually see that you're making Hex-Chrome by the yellowing color that develops in your electrolyte if its clear enough... we've got a professional Hex-Chrome test kit to measure the concentration... as the yellow color intensifies, the higher the concentration. You'd be surprised how quickly you can make the Hex-Chrome.

Now, if you decide to use the much more pricey, solid TITANIUM, or other exotic metal, you WILL NOT produce any HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM. The one problem with titanium is that you must use an exotic coating on the ANODE side of all the cell plates in order to produce any HHO. The one great thing about using the HSA coated TI plates is that they last much longer than other metals, and have been used under extreme conditions in industrial applications for decades - such as in saltwater desalination plants and to produce caustic chlorine bleach for water treatment. We (MileageSeekersHHO) have been recently experimenting and designing an extremely low current-leakage titanium cell, pictures of which you can see on this site. We believe that TI will become the future standard for marketable HHO cells, since the EPA will no doubt get involved in "police-ing" the HHO industry as it grows.

Unca RaF
I have thought of making a cell from platinum from a catalyst too, but it has stayed at the thought for me so far...

I have heard that platinum can be a small catalyst in the HHO making prosess, so it would be worth a try :-)
I've been told and would expect that platinum plates would be much more costly than consumers would want to pay for, even though I'll admit we've never priced them... even if someone would go to the trouble of "platinum plating" some other metal such as stainless steel sheet. Anyone want to put up the funds? We'll be glad to custom build the cell and flow test it with MileageSeekersHHO flow bench and test equipment. It might become that special something we've all been looking for!
the problem with that is there is very little platnum in a catco just a couple of grams each. you would need much more to build a hho system from that. but plating ss in plat can work or just make a switch to titanium

Russell Nagode said:
Been turning this over in my mind. If titanium can be used, could platinum also be used without producing Hex-C?

If so, then since the fossil fuel is being burned to the absoloute, what then is the need for a catalytic converter?

If you no longer need one, why not use the platinum put in the converters instead, to produce electrolysis cells?

This seems like a no-brainer to me.

Unca RaF said:
If you are using any stainless steel in your cell, you ARE going to produce HEX-CHROME according to a local Cleveland, Ohio area plater by the name of Aetna Plating. They've been in the plating business for decades and have been dealing with the Hex-Chrome issue with the EPA due to its toxicity. They claim no matter what you do to your SS plates, such as passivation or electropolishing, if you're using SS in the electrolysis process, you will produce Hex-Chrome as the SS dissolves. No doubt that passivation and/or electropolishing will remove most of the surface iron, but will leave the chromium on the surface... if you've ever seen SS plates that have undergone either of these processes, they look almost like they've been chrome plated... hence, they will still produce Hex-Chrome, but there will be little, if any, mud produced. You can also visually see that you're making Hex-Chrome by the yellowing color that develops in your electrolyte if its clear enough... we've got a professional Hex-Chrome test kit to measure the concentration... as the yellow color intensifies, the higher the concentration. You'd be surprised how quickly you can make the Hex-Chrome.

Now, if you decide to use the much more pricey, solid TITANIUM, or other exotic metal, you WILL NOT produce any HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM. The one problem with titanium is that you must use an exotic coating on the ANODE side of all the cell plates in order to produce any HHO. The one great thing about using the HSA coated TI plates is that they last much longer than other metals, and have been used under extreme conditions in industrial applications for decades - such as in saltwater desalination plants and to produce caustic chlorine bleach for water treatment. We (MileageSeekersHHO) have been recently experimenting and designing an extremely low current-leakage titanium cell, pictures of which you can see on this site. We believe that TI will become the future standard for marketable HHO cells, since the EPA will no doubt get involved in "police-ing" the HHO industry as it grows.

Unca RaF
Is everyone going to just ignore the table sugar method? That's a heckova lot cheaper than titanium or platinum!
I agree with you Gary. Why make it safe and expensive, when you can make it safe and cheap?

Gary said:
Is everyone going to just ignore the table sugar method? That's a heckova lot cheaper than titanium or platinum!
I contacted the person(s) that were involved in the research making the determination regarding table sugar, this was his response...

************************
First, I doubt you are going to produce much chromium from electrolysis of stainless steel. However, if you did, there are certainly better ways to reduce the chromate (CrO4 2- or Cr2O7 2-) to Cr 3+ or chromium metal. The sugar works but is better/more efficient on industrial scale or in environmental remediation (soil or lakes). Also, if the original electrolysis didn't reduce the Cr(VI) as soon as it was produced, you could easily do an electrolysis of the wastewater - the same process used to chrome plate metals.

I can check the sugar to Cr proportions we used and provide them to you, but I think there are better ways to chemically reduce any Cr(VI) produced. In fact, if there is any Cr(VI) produced, which I doubt, why not just use aluminum electrodes or some other metal.

Bryan Bilyeu, PhD
Dual Degree Engineering Program Coordinator
Assistant Professor of Chemistry
Xavier University of Louisiana
New Orleans LA 70125
(504)520-5414

***********************

Gary said:
Is everyone going to just ignore the table sugar method? That's a heckova lot cheaper than titanium or platinum!
Thanks Karl! That was a really good effort to get us all real information. We appreciate that :-)
The man's suggestion of aluminum means he simply isn't into automotive hydrolysys and unaware of the needs. The point about sugar in personal use as opposed to industrial use is that it's a simple fix anyone and everyone can and should do. If we needed chemicals, virtually Nobody would be doing it and whatever crud is in the old electrolyte goes into the gutter, toilet, yard or neighbor's fence.
I run a kit made by Keith Wagner co-owner of S&KHHO Fuelsystems.com. This is an 8 plate dry cell with a closed loop system..very nice kit the only kit recomended at the HHO games this last Feb. for certification. This kit uses potassium carbonate for the electrolyte.. this solution makes the cell run cooler and when I gave Keith a call about the concerns of the poduction of HEX he assured me this kit produces none.. I've been running my system over 6 months now and the electrolyte is still clear......Give them a shout at www.s&khhofuelsystems.com



Gary said:
The man's suggestion of aluminum means he simply isn't into automotive hydrolysys and unaware of the needs. The point about sugar in personal use as opposed to industrial use is that it's a simple fix anyone and everyone can and should do. If we needed chemicals, virtually Nobody would be doing it and whatever crud is in the old electrolyte goes into the gutter, toilet, yard or neighbor's fence.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Translate HODINFO

Latest Activity

gabet123 left a comment for harry K
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for initialfinalllll
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for ING. CARLOS DIAZ
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for harrishh73
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for crysmike
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for drozd
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for Hector German Cogott
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for angie sloan
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for calidoso377
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for fabio toldo
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for Glenn Robb
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday
gabet123 left a comment for gene eile
"Your interaction number 0"
yesterday

© 2012   Created by gabet123.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Offline

Live Video

Live Chat