• Male
  • MN
  • United States

Ryan's Friends

  • Matthew Bhagwandass
  • Mark Hagan
  • Dennis
  • don
  • Jimbeamandi
  • Bob Campbell
  • moe
  • Alan
  • brandon.sifford
  • Daniel Nowlin
  • Matt
  • zac
  • grant lincoln
  • Fatman!
  • Gary

Ryan's Discussions

Urine or ammonia instead of water?

Started this discussion. Last reply by Todd Miller Feb 3, 2011. 5 Replies

Cutting, glueing and/or welding plastic.

Started this discussion. Last reply by Gary Aug 7, 2008. 4 Replies

Unplugging the 02 (oxygen) sensor.

Started this discussion. Last reply by fishwiz45 Aug 12, 2008. 28 Replies


Ryan's Page

Profile Information

What is your HOD level of experience?
Intermediate Builder

Comment Wall (23 comments)

You need to be a member of HODINFO to add comments!


At 12:47am on August 23, 2012, Tyson Capel said…

Nice lookin cell! What kind of production are you getting out of it?

At 2:30am on July 19, 2012, gabet123 said…

Your interaction number 295

At 10:56am on August 7, 2008, Jimbeamandi said…
sounds worthwhile to investigte. Thanks,
At 8:10am on August 7, 2008, Jimbeamandi said…
Hi, I am currently assisting one of my friends with an install that he has done, before I met him, and helping him to figure out some issues. Some of the things that are plagueing me are the best location for unit placement, what wire to splice into (vice just unhooking the rear window defroster for example and useing that as a power source) and which sensors to "modify". I have read some material that in just installing the sensors alone wil give you gains without the actuall HHO gen isntalled. Have yet to see anything substantial on that. As for my friends car, he states an improvement from 29MPG to 34 MPG. BUT...and I mean BUT, this is only after we have both gained and then lost the MPG gains. We have been able to keep the gains by just reseting the computer every few hundred miles or so with out the need of sensor enhancers.
???? I don't know if this makes to much sense.

My theory was that the sensors try and bring the exhaust back to its acceptable dirtyness (factory spec) after a few readings. The new parameters are now going to nullify the mpg gains that were attained from the HHO gen (because of it causing a more complete burn the exhaust is now not dirty enough) I really am at a loss here as to what to make out of this. I guess I'm trying to figure this out as to what is doing what before I make the leap into installing one into my car. On another note....
My girlfriends parents saw the material that I was reading and had stated that a reputable mech is attempting to install one in a vehicle that he has in the shop. The mech stated to my GF's parents that it is not recommended to install one of these into a car that has over 75,000 miles.
????? WHAT???
How did this info get out??? That would mean that the systems work and trials have been done and it is now reccomended that the systems.... what ever!!

Have you ever heard of anyone not recommending to install one on a vehicle because of the amount of milage on a car???
I havent until now. Which I think is a crock of crap!! Anyway, I'm trying to figure out how to capture the gains achieved, wit out much sensor modifications.

Arent we living a most glorious world of wants and needs? lol.

What have you discovered that you need on your sensors? and have you been able to keep you gains? Thanks,Tim.
At 10:32am on July 29, 2008, grant lincoln said…
ya it went in ok and works fine now thank goodness
At 12:18am on July 22, 2008, Alan said…
yeah i think the y fitting will create a siphoning effect might have to put a air inlet on the cell but i will try it without before doing that
At 6:54pm on July 19, 2008, Gary said…
Why, Yes, they do. It's all documented in the Smack instructions. You'll want to see the new design too. Here: http://www.smacksboosters.110mb.com/
Page down to "smack's booster revealed" and hit the link.
At 10:22am on July 17, 2008, Gary said…
We have a 1.5L Paseo, and the unit's doing .75L/min.
I'm not sure yet about who gets the best. I've seen posts saying units work better on diesels and big engines, but see the most gains on little cars. Go figger.
At 12:43am on July 17, 2008, Trent said…
No problem, I figured it out. I am pulling more amps than I thought. I dropped it down to 2 cells and held almost the same gas production as 3 cells. Which probably means instead of 90 amps, I am pulling more like about 100amps.
At 12:17am on July 15, 2008, Fatman! said…
You ever get ur cell doing better?

*** Translate HODINFO ***

© 2019   Created by gabet123.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service

Live Chat