Comment

Comment by Mike Walsh on February 4, 2012 at 11:36pm

All the Aardvark postings are courtesy of Bruce Simpson, An egocentric master of propaganda and self-proclaimed consumer advocate. He came out with the infamous "Million Dollar HHO Challenge". The so-called challenge said that if any HHOer could come forward with proof that it works, one million dollars would be awarded. Of course, there were about 100 different statutes or limitations that you had to follow to get the money. Many were flat out impossible to accomplish. Like turning on your system and seeing a 40% increase in power or RPMs. I remember reading over them and one of them was after running your system for so long the engine on your vehicle must be torn down and completely lab analyzed for any evidence of lean burn damage etc, etc. There were SO many hoops to jump through that no one could have pulled it off, not even NASA. Then Simpson claimed that he had won and exposed the fraud of HHO claims because not one stepped forward to participate in his little circus. The press had a field day, and he loved every minute in the spotlight. He recites the same garbage theories and dogma over and over again. Nothing new there. Now that so much proof has come to light about HHO actually working Bruce has since retracted his Million Dollar Challenge, with no comment I might add.

Comment by moldoveanu.marius on February 4, 2012 at 4:22pm

I attached a report from real life application.

First test reveal 32% fuel savings but is just the carbon deposit "cleaning" and extra power come from extra "fuel".

And all was done with a improvised generator very inefficient!

As may notice the higher result are at higher load ..High RPM is not a good condition for oxyhydrogen additive unless the gas/air  proportion is not correlated.

The use of deprotonated water vapors may improve the results.

Increasing the torque is the source of savings and water injection alone can do that but may reduce the flammability of fuel.

Oxyhydrogen and water injection  ( steam is better due atomization ) may provide great fuel savings! Period!

All the tests or experiments who proved no results are conducted in incorrect way.

 

Comment by moldoveanu.marius on February 4, 2012 at 4:10pm

Comment by Stephen on January 28, 2012 at 12:03pm

Mentioning ground loop noise makes a very good point that, yes, everyone should investigate. I think that, in many cases, installers simply overlook ground quality in general. This seems like a large dynamic variable. 

Interaction calculated Comment by hHOFEe on January 25, 2012 at 8:54am

A very well done thesis by "Ali Can Yilmaz" - Design and Applications of hydroxy (hho) System- done in 2010 is not very well known about. Also articles like "Ruggero Maria Santilli" - A new gaseous and combustible form of water- are good reading. There are several others as well. If you can not find them online I will dig them out of my archives for you.