Electronysis A Spectacular New Vernacular Page 3.


Electronysis A Spectacular New Vernacular Page 3.

Why is a new vernacular needed? Let me give you an illustration. When I was a boy at my great grandmothers house in the hallway on the wall there was a telephone. It was black it had a rotary dial and the receiver weighed a couple pounds. So let's look at the vernacular used at that time regarding the telephone system, Wire, receiver, rotary dial, telephone poll, operator, phone jack etcetera. Now let's look at the vernacular of the phone system of today, wireless network, smartphone, touchscreen, battery, charger, SIM card, cell tower, etcetera. So as you can see here the vernacular has completely changed however were talking about the same thing a telephone. The old fashioned telephone an electromechanical device the smart-phone an electronic hand held computer.

Here is the main reason why I am proposing a new vernacular. I started my research about 10 years ago when I came across the work of Stan Meyer. It was just the beginning though as the years have gone by I also studied the work of Wiseman, Rhodes, Brown, Boyce, and Santilli just to name a few. All of these men have created their own vernacular to describe what they are doing, however, they are all talk about the same thing splitting water.

I have spent the last 10 years trying to connect the dots as it were of all these researchers and realized that the problem was in the language. For instance, early on Stan used the term " water fuel cell capacitor " as time went on though he dropped the word capacitor. So where in an LC circuit does the water fuel cell go? See the confusion. The capacitor has a dual function it has to function as the capacitor in an LC circuit that has the side effect of splitting water in the magnetic field that is created in the capacitors dialectric liquid.

I came up with the word "Electronysis " because I thought it was the best choice as a word symbol that describes what is happening in the process to differentiate between the two processes electrolysis and electronysis. A natural evolution of the word creation process. I also wanted to refrain from a word symbol that was derived from the discoverers name.

Here is another problem capacitors don't have electrolyte they have a dialectric material and in the case of a " water fuel cell capacitor " it has a dialectric liquid. Another big problem if you are trying to figure out how to build what Stan described in his work. I want to end the confusion so I identify the capacitor in an electronysis circuit as the " Electronysis Liquid Multi-Capacitor " because it is the best word symbol that describes its function. If you don't have the language right you won't be able to build it right. It's like the Tower of Babel story when the language was confused nobody could figure out what to do.

So if we are going to make the shift from electrolysis which is electric to electronysis
which is electronic we are going to have to come up with some new words to describe what we are talking about.

  • Here is a photo of a fully automatic electronysis system, does it look like a electrolysis system? It has a few more parts however the benefit is worth the extra parts. I will go more into the benefits in the next page.

Views: 58

Comment

You need to be a member of HODINFO to add comments!

Join HODINFO

Comment by Jim Mitchell on September 27, 2018 at 2:02pm

To Charles. Thanks for sharing your opinion.

Comment by charles ware on September 27, 2018 at 10:50am

Jim,  sorry for any misunderstanding,  but on your first post of Sept. 3, you start with Stan Meyer.  Hello?  Stan Meyer most certainly did claim to have achieved over-unity.   So if start out by saying "Stan Meyer", I will be thinking "over-unity".

Well anyway, about reducing power consumption on an HHO reactor,  the amount of power used by an HHO reactor is pretty inconsequential. I wrote a monograph where I analyzed energy yield of 8 different lab tests of the effect of electrolytically generated gas mixtures on the efficiency of Diesel engines. click here for paper On 5 of the tests the result was minimal ... the yield failed even to exceed the thermodynamic break even point.  But I don't think those guys even knew what they were doing.  The other three gave average yields of about 6 megajoule per gram of HHO hydrogen. The heat of combustion of hydrogen is about 0.1 megajoule per gram. That's about a 60 fold difference. The efficiency of a reactor will be about 50-70%.  The efficiency of an automotive alternator is about 55%.  Even if you had some kind of electronics that raised the reactor efficiency to 100%,  that cuts the overhead of running the reactor from 6% down to about 3%.

In my opinion,  if you want to be taken seriously,  just write a report on your results. Give the data, procedures for measuring it, analysis, etc. I am an engineer myself, not too interested in some kind of "vernacular".  Just show me the numbers, please.

Comment by Jim Mitchell on September 26, 2018 at 5:29pm

To Jeremy. I am going to offer a work book on how to diy.

To Charles. No I not saying this device over-unity! In fact none of the researchers that I have studied claimed to have a method that was over-unity. So if you use the illustration of the old fashioned telephone vs the modern smartphone which one uses more power? My guess is the smartphone uses less power and is more efficient at communication.

Comment by charles ware on September 26, 2018 at 4:43pm

So are saying this device is overunity?   I am not sure?   If so,  can you put a number on it?  There was one guy,  Dr.  Tadahiko Mizuno,  click here for paper  who stated he had overunity of about 300. At one point, they estimated it went to 800 when the reaction vessel burst.  I guess it was pretty unstable.  Not the sort of thing you would want to do on an industrial scale. There have other experiments that supposedly demonstrated overunity.  I guess the problem has been getting enough reliable consistency. And it has to be pretty reliable if you want to make it into a product.

Comment by Jeremy Dukes on September 25, 2018 at 7:51pm

What do we need to do to get one or build one?

Comment by Jeremy Dukes on September 25, 2018 at 7:42pm

Wow it looks like a flux capacitor!

*** Translate HODINFO ***

© 2018   Created by gabet123.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service

Live Chat